A Chemical Manufacturing Safety Manual provides written occupational safety and health programs, procedures, and responsibilities for chemical manufacturers, chemical plants, blending and formulation facilities, specialty chemical manufacturers, process plants, and other employers that manufacture, process, formulate, blend, repackage, or handle industrial chemicals.
Chemical manufacturing employees may work around reactors, mixers, blenders, tanks, pressure vessels, piping systems, pumps, compressors, transfer systems, loading racks, process controls, flammable liquids, corrosives, toxic substances, reactive chemicals, gases, powders, drums, bulk containers, forklifts, and other industrial equipment.
These operations can expose employees to serious hazards including toxic chemical exposure, fires, explosions, runaway reactions, pressure releases, flammable atmospheres, corrosive materials, hazardous energy, confined spaces, respiratory hazards, chemical incompatibility, machinery, combustible dust, electrical hazards, and material handling.
An effective Chemical Manufacturing Safety Manual should therefore reflect the facility’s actual chemicals, processes, equipment, quantities, storage systems, reaction hazards, transfer operations, maintenance activities, and employee duties.
Chemical manufacturing is primarily regulated under OSHA’s 29 CFR Part 1910 — General Industry standards.
Unlike industries with one comprehensive industry-specific OSHA standard, chemical manufacturing facilities may be subject to numerous standards according to the chemicals, processes, equipment, and hazards present.
Potentially applicable requirements may include:
The safety manual should be tailored to the facility rather than assuming every chemical-manufacturing requirement applies to every operation.
Chemical manufacturing can include a wide range of processes and products.
Operations may include:
The hazards and programs required can vary substantially among these operations.
Depending on operations, a Chemical Manufacturing Safety Manual may address:
Programs should be included according to actual processes and regulatory applicability.
An effective Chemical Manufacturing Safety Program establishes responsibilities and procedures for controlling chemical, process, equipment, fire, explosion, pressure, exposure, and other workplace hazards.
Management should provide:
Managers, supervisors, and designated safety personnel should:
Employees should follow established procedures, use required controls and PPE, understand chemical hazards, and promptly report leaks, releases, damaged equipment, abnormal process conditions, injuries, and other hazards.
Chemical-manufacturing hazard assessments should consider both the inherent hazards of individual chemicals and the risks created by the processes in which those chemicals are used.
Potential hazards may include:
Assessments should consider the quantity, concentration, physical form, temperature, pressure, containment, process conditions, and potential routes of employee exposure.
Chemical manufacturing requires evaluation beyond simply reading Safety Data Sheets.
Process hazards may result from:
Potential consequences should be considered before processes are operated or modified.
A JSA/JHA may be used to evaluate higher-risk chemical-manufacturing activities.
Potential JSAs/JHAs may address:
The analysis should identify job steps, hazards, controls, PPE, and employee responsibilities.
OSHA’s Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals standard, 29 CFR 1910.119, applies to covered processes containing specified highly hazardous chemicals or qualifying quantities of flammable gases or flammable liquids.
PSM should not automatically be assigned to every chemical manufacturer.
Applicability should be determined from:
Where PSM applies, it becomes a major component of the facility’s safety-management system.
Covered PSM processes require appropriate process safety information.
Information may address:
Information should be accurate and available to personnel who need it.
A Process Hazard Analysis, or PHA, is a systematic evaluation of what can go wrong in a covered process and the safeguards used to prevent or mitigate hazardous releases.
PHA methods may include:
The selected method should be appropriate to the complexity of the process.
A Process Hazard Analysis should consider applicable:
Recommendations should be resolved and documented.
Written operating procedures should describe how covered processes are operated safely.
Procedures may address:
Operating limits and consequences of deviation should be clearly addressed.
Employees should understand safe process limits involving factors such as:
Procedures should identify actions required when limits are exceeded.
Employees assigned emergency-shutdown responsibilities should understand:
Emergency shutdown should be performed only by personnel trained for the assignment.
Changes to covered processes should be evaluated before implementation.
Management of Change may apply to changes involving:
The review should consider:
Affected safety information should be updated as required.
A Pre-Startup Safety Review should be completed for applicable new or modified covered processes before introducing hazardous chemicals.
The review should confirm applicable:
The process should not be started until required conditions have been satisfied.
Mechanical Integrity programs help ensure safety-critical process equipment remains suitable for service.
Covered equipment may include:
Inspection and testing should follow appropriate procedures and recognized practices.
Preventive maintenance should address process and safety-critical equipment regardless of whether PSM applies.
Potential equipment includes:
Deficiencies should be corrected before equipment creates an unacceptable hazard.
Process alarms may warn employees of conditions involving:
Alarms should be maintained and employees should understand required responses.
Process interlocks may prevent or stop hazardous conditions.
Employees should not bypass or defeat interlocks except under controlled, authorized procedures.
Temporary bypasses should be carefully managed.
Emergency shutdown systems should be maintained so they perform their intended safety function.
Testing and inspection should reflect equipment requirements and facility procedures.
Emergency shutdown does not necessarily substitute for Lockout/Tagout during servicing.
Batch operations may involve repeated charging, mixing, heating, reaction, cooling, sampling, and transfer.
Hazards may arise from:
Batch procedures should clearly identify approved sequence and operating limits.
Chemical reactors can involve substantial:
Operators should understand normal and abnormal reactor conditions.
Employees should not open, enter, or service reactors until applicable chemical, pressure, temperature, and energy hazards have been controlled.
Certain reactions can accelerate rapidly and generate dangerous heat and pressure.
Prevention may require controls involving:
Potential runaway reactions should be evaluated during process design and hazard analysis.
Materials should not be combined unless their compatibility and reaction hazards are understood.
Incompatible chemicals can cause:
Procedures should prevent incorrect charging and cross-contamination.
Mixers and blenders may expose employees to:
Equipment should be guarded and applicable ventilation and containment maintained.
Chemical charging procedures should identify:
Employees should verify materials before adding them to a process.
Closed transfer systems can reduce employee exposure and release potential.
Systems should be inspected for:
Closed systems do not eliminate the need for appropriate emergency planning.
Where chemicals are manually added, procedures should address:
Mechanical or closed-transfer methods should be used where feasible and appropriate.
Chemical-manufacturing facilities may use tanks for:
Tank hazards should be evaluated according to contents and operating conditions.
Overfilling can result in:
Appropriate level controls, alarms, procedures, or other safeguards should be maintained.
Tanks should have ventilation or pressure-relief provisions appropriate to the material and process.
Blocked or inadequate vents can contribute to:
Vent systems should be inspected and maintained.
Storage-tank procedures should consider:
Tank identification should remain clear.
Piping may transport:
Piping systems should be designed, identified, inspected, and maintained according to the hazards involved.
Piping and valves should be sufficiently identified so employees can determine system contents and function where necessary for safe operation and maintenance.
Confusion between similar lines can cause serious chemical incidents.
Opening process piping can expose employees to residual:
Before line breaking:
Employees should assume lines contain hazardous material until a safe condition has been established.
Certain systems may use double-block-and-bleed arrangements to isolate hazardous process material.
The method selected should provide protection appropriate to the process and maintenance activity.
Blanking or blinding may be necessary where valve closure alone does not provide adequate isolation.
Blinds should be appropriate for system pressure and chemical service.
Chemical pumps can expose employees to leaks from:
Leakage should be promptly evaluated and corrected.
Employees should not perform maintenance until hazardous energy and chemical contents have been controlled.
Compressors may create hazards involving:
Equipment should be inspected and maintained.
Potential gas hazards should be considered when compressors handle hazardous materials.
Pressure vessels can release large amounts of stored energy if they fail or are improperly opened.
Before servicing:
Pressure-relief devices should be maintained.
Relief systems may protect equipment from dangerous overpressure.
Systems should be evaluated for:
Discharge from relief devices should not create unacceptable employee exposure.
Vacuum vessels and systems can fail from:
Equipment should be designed and maintained for the operating conditions.
Chemical storage and handling should be based on compatibility.
Potentially incompatible categories may include:
Compatibility should be evaluated from specific chemical information rather than broad assumptions alone.
Incompatible chemicals should be separated using methods appropriate to the hazard.
Controls may include:
Spills should not be able to combine and create a more severe hazard.
Chemical facilities may handle strong acids and caustics capable of causing severe burns.
Controls may include:
Employees should receive training on specific corrosive materials used.
Acid handling should address:
Water should never be added or mixed with concentrated acids contrary to established safe procedures.
Caustic materials can cause severe skin and eye injury.
Employees should use appropriate:
Leaks and spills should be controlled promptly.
Oxidizing chemicals can intensify fires and react dangerously with incompatible materials.
Storage and handling should control:
Some chemicals can react violently with water.
Procedures should address:
Employees should understand where water must not be used.
Pyrophoric materials may ignite spontaneously upon exposure to air.
Where present, procedures should address:
Only trained employees should handle these materials.
Certain chemicals can form unstable peroxides during storage.
Controls may include:
Containers with suspected dangerous crystal formation or deterioration should not be disturbed without appropriate evaluation.
Flammable-liquid operations should control:
Equipment and procedures should reflect the liquid’s properties and quantities involved.
Storage areas should meet applicable requirements for:
Quantities should be managed according to applicable requirements.
Transfer of flammable liquids may generate static electricity.
Where required, equipment should be bonded or grounded to reduce ignition risk.
Connections should be maintained and inspected.
Flammable vapors should be controlled using appropriate:
Employees should recognize that vapors can travel to distant ignition sources.
Chemical manufacturers may handle substances capable of causing acute or chronic health effects.
Exposure should be evaluated through:
Controls should reflect routes of exposure and applicable occupational exposure limits.
Certain chemicals are regulated by specific OSHA standards.
Depending on operations, these may include substances such as:
Applicability should be evaluated based on chemicals and employee exposure.
Chemical processes can release:
Employee exposure should be controlled to applicable limits.
Engineering controls should be used where feasible and required.
Exposure monitoring may be necessary to determine employee exposure to hazardous substances.
Monitoring programs should consider:
Results should be communicated and retained as required.
Local exhaust ventilation can capture contaminants near their source.
Systems should be designed for the specific process and contaminant.
Employees should report:
Ventilation systems should be maintained.
General ventilation may supplement source controls.
Ventilation should not spread hazardous contaminants into occupied work areas.
Airflow should reflect process and chemical hazards.
Where respirators are necessary, the employer should maintain a Respiratory Protection Program meeting applicable requirements.
Elements may include:
Respirators should be selected for the specific chemical and concentration.
Emergency or highly hazardous atmospheres may require respiratory protection suitable for IDLH conditions.
Employees should not enter unknown or IDLH atmospheres without appropriate equipment, training, backup, and rescue capability.
PPE should be selected through a documented hazard assessment.
Potential PPE may include:
PPE selection should account for specific chemical compatibility.
No single glove material protects against every chemical.
Selection should consider:
Employees should replace contaminated or damaged gloves as appropriate.
Chemical splash hazards may require both chemical goggles and face protection.
A face shield should not automatically be treated as a substitute for required primary eye protection.
Protective clothing should be selected according to the expected exposure.
Contaminated clothing should be removed and handled so employees are not exposed during removal, laundering, disposal, or reuse.
Emergency eyewash equipment should be provided where employees may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials as required.
Equipment should be:
Emergency showers should be available where body exposure to corrosive materials may occur and applicable requirements make them necessary.
Employees should know their locations.
Hazard Communication is particularly important in chemical manufacturing because chemical manufacturers have responsibilities both to their own employees and to downstream users of hazardous chemicals they produce.
The program should address:
Hazard information should remain accurate and understandable.
Chemical manufacturers and importers must evaluate the hazards of chemicals they produce or import and classify those hazards as required.
Classification should reflect available scientific information concerning applicable:
Mixtures should be evaluated according to applicable criteria.
Required labels should communicate applicable:
Product labels should reflect the required hazard classification.
Chemical manufacturers and importers must prepare required Safety Data Sheets for hazardous chemicals they produce or import.
SDS information should be reviewed and updated as required when significant new hazard or protection information becomes known.
Chemical manufacturers must transmit appropriate hazard information to downstream employers and users.
Accurate labels and Safety Data Sheets are therefore not merely internal workplace documents.
Process containers, secondary containers, and portable containers should be labeled as required.
Employees should not transfer chemicals into unidentified containers.
Sampling can expose employees to concentrated chemicals, pressure, heat, or process vapors.
Sampling procedures should address:
Closed-loop sampling should be used where appropriate.
Chemical manufacturers may maintain quality-control, research, or process laboratories.
Laboratory operations may require additional procedures for:
Laboratory requirements should be coordinated with plant-wide chemical safety programs.
Chemical drums may be:
Mechanical handling equipment should be used where appropriate.
Employees should not stand in hazardous positions when opening or moving drums.
Before opening a drum, employees should identify:
Bulging, damaged, leaking, or unknown drums should receive special evaluation.
IBCs should be inspected for:
Stacking and movement should follow container and equipment limitations.
Bulk deliveries may involve:
Procedures should address:
Before transfer begins, employees should verify:
Incorrect chemical transfer can create catastrophic reactions.
Transfer hoses should be:
Employees should remain clear of pressurized hoses where possible.
Bulk unloading areas should control:
Vehicles should be secured against unintended movement during transfer.
Chemical railcar unloading should address:
Only trained employees should perform transfer operations.
Finished chemical products may be loaded into:
Loading procedures should prevent:
Chemical manufacturing may involve powders capable of creating:
Powder processes should be evaluated according to the material’s properties.
Certain chemical products and raw materials may be combustible when present as fine dust.
Potential materials may include certain:
Facilities should evaluate actual dust explosibility rather than assume every powder presents the same hazard.
Dust collection should prevent unnecessary release and accumulation.
Systems should be evaluated for:
Where combustible dust exists, collector location and protection require careful evaluation.
Some chemical processes may use nitrogen or other inert gases to reduce oxygen concentrations.
While inerting can reduce fire and explosion potential, it can create severe oxygen-deficiency hazards.
Employees should understand where inert gases are used.
Nitrogen is colorless and odorless and can displace oxygen without warning.
Potential controls may include:
Employees should not enter potentially oxygen-deficient areas without appropriate evaluation.
Chemical plants may contain numerous confined spaces, including:
Spaces should be evaluated according to OSHA’s Permit-Required Confined Space requirements.
Potential permit-space hazards may include:
Procedures should address entry authorization, testing, isolation, ventilation, attendant duties, rescue, and termination.
Before entering process vessels:
Entry should not begin until safe conditions have been established.
Rescue planning should be completed before permit entry begins.
Rescue resources should be capable of responding to the specific space and hazards.
Employees should not make uncontrolled rescue entries.
Chemical-process equipment can contain multiple energy sources.
Lockout/Tagout procedures may be required during covered:
Potential energy sources include:
Hazardous-energy control in a chemical plant may require more than electrical lockout.
Chemical flow should be controlled through appropriate:
Isolation should reflect potential consequences of leakage.
Major maintenance or shutdowns may involve multiple crafts, departments, and contractors.
Group procedures should provide each authorized employee with required protection.
Coordination should be maintained across shifts.
Chemical manufacturing facilities require careful control of welding, cutting, brazing, grinding, and other ignition-producing work.
Hot Work procedures should address:
Work should not begin until applicable hazards have been controlled.
Hot Work permit systems may be used to document:
Where PSM applies, Hot Work permits have specific regulatory significance for work on or near covered processes.
Fire watches should be assigned where required.
Fire-watch personnel should:
Chemical facilities should control both fuel and ignition sources.
Potential fire hazards may include:
Fire-prevention procedures should reflect the chemicals and processes present.
Explosion hazards may arise from:
Controls should address both prevention and mitigation.
Potential ignition sources may include:
Ignition-source controls should reflect hazardous-area conditions.
Static electricity can ignite flammable atmospheres or combustible dust.
Controls may include:
Controls should be based on the process and material.
Locations where flammable gases, vapors, or combustible dust may be present can require appropriately classified electrical equipment.
Electrical installations should match the hazardous location classification.
Chemical manufacturing electrical systems may include:
Qualified personnel should perform electrical work.
Damaged equipment should be removed from service or repaired.
Chemical releases can require emergency actions beyond ordinary spill cleanup.
The employer should clearly determine employee roles.
Employees may be assigned to:
Employees should not perform emergency duties beyond their training and equipment.
Emergency response to uncontrolled releases of hazardous substances may trigger OSHA HAZWOPER emergency-response requirements.
Applicability depends on the nature of the release and employee response activities.
Facilities should distinguish between:
Small releases that do not pose significant safety or health hazards and can be safely controlled by employees in the immediate area may be handled under appropriate workplace procedures.
Employees should understand when a release exceeds incidental response capability.
Employees should evacuate and initiate established emergency procedures when a release presents hazards beyond their training or equipment.
Potential signs may include:
Facilities should use appropriate controls to reduce the likelihood and consequences of spills.
Potential controls include:
Spill procedures should address the particular chemical.
Response may involve:
Employees should not use generic spill methods on chemicals that may react dangerously with absorbents or water.
Emergency procedures should reflect the facility’s hazards.
Potential emergencies may include:
Employees should understand alarm systems, evacuation routes, assembly areas, and reporting procedures.
Certain toxic-release scenarios may make shelter-in-place more protective than immediate outdoor evacuation.
Where shelter-in-place is part of the emergency plan, procedures should identify:
Emergency equipment may include:
Equipment should be accessible, inspected, and maintained.
Facilities may use fixed or portable gas detection for:
Detectors should be selected for the anticipated hazard.
Alarm levels and required employee actions should be established.
Some OSHA substance-specific standards and respiratory-protection requirements may require medical surveillance or medical evaluation.
Applicability should be determined from the chemical and exposure.
Chemical-manufacturing occupational health programs may address:
Industrial hygiene evaluations should reflect actual exposures.
Noise may result from:
Employee noise exposure should be evaluated.
A Hearing Conservation Program should be implemented when applicable requirements are met.
Chemical manufacturing may expose employees to heat from:
Heat-illness prevention should consider workload, environmental conditions, acclimatization, hydration, rest, and PPE.
Outdoor operations, refrigerated processes, or cryogenic systems may expose employees to cold.
Appropriate clothing, work practices, and exposure controls should be provided.
Certain facilities may manufacture or use cryogenic liquids.
Potential hazards include:
Equipment and PPE should reflect cryogenic hazards.
Compressed gases may include:
Cylinder and bulk-gas systems should be designed and maintained for their specific service.
Cylinders should be:
Valves and regulators should be protected from contamination and damage.
Highly toxic gases require particularly robust controls.
Potential controls may include:
Controls should reflect chemical-specific hazards.
Facilities manufacturing or using chlorine should address its acute toxicity, corrosivity, and oxidizing properties.
Controls may include:
Chlorine should not be assumed to be present at all chemical plants.
Anhydrous ammonia can create significant inhalation, chemical-burn, pressure, and release hazards.
Systems should be inspected and maintained.
Emergency procedures should reflect the potential release scenarios.
Hydrogen presents significant flammability concerns and can ignite over a wide range of concentrations.
Controls may include:
Hydrogen sulfide may be present or generated in certain processes.
Potential controls include:
Shipping and receiving may involve:
Traffic, chemical transfer, and material-handling hazards should be coordinated.
Forklifts may be used to move:
Only trained and authorized employees should operate applicable equipment.
Facilities should separate pedestrians from powered equipment where practical.
Controls may include:
Drums and IBCs should be stored to prevent:
Leaking containers should be isolated and addressed promptly.
Chemical warehouses should address:
Chemicals should not be stored solely according to alphabetical order when incompatibilities exist.
Chemical manufacturing facilities may contain:
Moving machinery should be guarded according to applicable requirements.
Filling, capping, labeling, and packaging equipment can create:
Employees should follow machine-specific procedures.
Conveyors may move raw materials, containers, or packaged products.
Required guards should protect employees from:
Applicable hazardous-energy controls should be used during servicing.
Chemical manufacturing housekeeping should address:
Aisles and emergency equipment should remain accessible.
Facilities may contain:
Walking-working surfaces should be maintained and protected according to applicable requirements.
Employees may require fall protection while working around:
Hazards should be evaluated according to work location.
Ladders should be appropriate for the task and maintained in safe condition.
Employees should not use process piping or equipment as improvised access.
Chemical plants frequently use contractors for:
Contractors should receive information about hazards relevant to their work.
Where PSM applies, contractor responsibilities should meet applicable PSM requirements.
Major shutdowns and turnarounds may involve large numbers of employees and contractors.
Planning should address:
Multiple simultaneous activities require careful coordination.
Before restarting process equipment after maintenance, the facility should verify:
Additional pre-startup requirements may apply to covered PSM processes.
Employees should promptly report:
Near misses involving chemical or process hazards can provide important warning information.
Significant incidents should be investigated to identify:
Investigations may consider:
Covered PSM processes have specific incident-investigation requirements.
Root Cause Analysis may identify underlying issues involving:
Corrective actions should address identified causes rather than merely assigning blame.
Periodic safety inspections should evaluate applicable:
Identified deficiencies should be corrected according to risk and applicable requirements.
Employee training should reflect assigned duties and hazards.
Depending on responsibilities, training may address:
Employees should not independently perform specialized work until they have received appropriate training.
Process operators should understand:
Training should reflect the equipment and processes assigned.
New employees should receive safety orientation before independently performing assigned work.
Orientation may address:
Refresher or remedial training may be appropriate following:
Specific regulatory standards may establish mandatory retraining or refresher frequencies.
Periodic safety meetings may reinforce topics such as:
Chemical manufacturers should maintain safety and health records required for their operations.
Records may include:
Records should be retained according to applicable requirements.
Depending on the facility’s chemicals, processes, and employee exposures, additional programs may be necessary for:
Programs should be included when the facility’s operations and regulatory applicability make them necessary.
A useful Chemical Manufacturing Safety Manual should be built around the actual chemicals and processes at the facility.
A batch chemical plant may require extensive procedures for chemical charging, reaction control, mixing, sampling, transfer, cleaning, batch sequencing, chemical compatibility, and operator response to abnormal conditions.
A continuous-process chemical facility may require greater emphasis on process controls, alarms, interlocks, pressure systems, mechanical integrity, Management of Change, startup and shutdown procedures, and emergency isolation.
A specialty chemical manufacturer may handle relatively small batches but use a wide variety of toxic, corrosive, flammable, reactive, or sensitizing materials requiring extensive Hazard Communication, chemical compatibility, ventilation, PPE, and exposure-control procedures.
A facility with covered quantities of highly hazardous chemicals may require a comprehensive Process Safety Management system involving Process Safety Information, PHA, operating procedures, training, Mechanical Integrity, Management of Change, Pre-Startup Safety Review, contractor controls, Hot Work, emergency planning, incident investigation, and compliance audits.
A blending or formulation facility may have fewer chemical reactions but significant hazards involving bulk unloading, mixing, flammable liquids, powders, chemical transfer, drum handling, packaging, and forklift operations.
The safety manual should therefore reflect actual hazards rather than automatically assigning every chemical-industry program to every manufacturer.
A Chemical Manufacturing Safety Manual can be developed around the facility’s chemicals, processes, reactors, tanks, piping, pressure systems, flammable materials, toxic substances, bulk transfer operations, maintenance activities, employees, and other occupational hazards.
The finished manual may incorporate applicable programs for Process Safety Management, Hazard Communication, Chemical Compatibility, Flammable Liquids, Respiratory Protection, Confined Space, Lockout/Tagout, Hot Work, Spill Response, Emergency Response, Mechanical Integrity, Contractor Safety, Incident Investigation, and other hazards associated with chemical manufacturing.
This provides chemical manufacturers, chemical plants, blending facilities, formulation operations, and specialty chemical manufacturers with a practical safety manual organized around the work their employees actually perform.